California Goes Galt!

California made its voice heard today when a proposal for higher taxes, being passed as ‘solvency’ for California, was rejected via a vote by the people. 

California has been engaging in various protests, tea parties, tax revolts, what have you, over the course of several months to make a point to the state legislature, as well as the rest of the country.  Folks, I hate to say it, but with our current out of control government and spending practices in D.C. the rest of the nation could very well end up like the state of California and sooner rather than later!

Ahhhhhnold tried to pass another budget measure which would increase taxes on anything from cigarette butts to pets to raise revenue for the state.  This didn’t fly with Californians – quite interesting for such a blue state!  Maybe some of the citizens are beginning to realize that the progressive/liberal policies enacted through the state legislature have done incredible amounts of damage.  The unfortunate outcome may in fact be that the rest of the states will have to bailout California, which could set a horrible precedent for any other state going through tough economic times. 

California voters overwhelmingly rejected five of six budget referendums yesterday which would have approved higher taxes as a means to patch budget woes in the Golden State. Had the measures passed, the state would still have faced a $15.4 billion deficit. With the failure of the measures, the state now grapples with $21.3 billion in red ink.

Out of control spending and high taxes driving business out of state are at the core of California’s budget problems. Now voters in a tax revolt have overwhelmingly rejected more of the same from California lawmakers, choosing instead a path that could force budget cuts and spending restraint. Imagine that.

The only measure on the ballot that passed was one that bars state officials from receiving a pay increase during tough economic times.

Left wingers are up in arms over the voters’ decision, because they loves taxes and government control!  So leave it to the nasty, hateful liberals to call those who voted against the measure a moronic mob!  The only morons I see are those who continue to vote for these liberals who implement horrible and irresponsible policies that cause these disasters and hurt California citizens.

Newspapers Going Bankrupt; Dems Want Bailed Out ‘Independent’ Media

The New York Times and the Boston Globe are both in dire straits.  To add more fuel to the fire, the Boston Globe is owned by the New York Times and both papers are losing significant amounts of money and are experiencing severe debt problems.

As The New York Times Co. tries to bask in the glory of having bagged five Pulitzers, the company is facing a cash crunch that could put it on the path toward insolvency.

According to its first-quarter earnings report, the Times said it had cash and cash equivalents totaling $294 million.

However, $260 million of that is earmarked to pay off debt that matures in March 2010, effectively leaving the company with $34 million.

That’s a particularly precarious position to be in, given the Gray Lady posted a wider-than-expected, first-quarter loss of $74.5 million amid worsening advertising declines, and is scrambling to raise cash as it labors under a $1.3 billion debt load.

This should be an indication of ultra liberal slants on newspapers and how they fare in Capitalist environments.  Most newspapers will probably go the way of the Internet with paid member subscriptions, but it’s quite interesting how most of the papers going out of business are more liberal than right-leaning. Read more

Shocker! GM Will Default on Debt Payments

GM has confirmed that it will be unable to make its debt payments due on June 1st, 2009.  The payment due on that date is $1 billion.

It’s a debt for equity exchange, so it’ll never have to be repaid.  This is just posturing ahead of the June 1 deadline (that of course will never get extended…) to come up with a plan for viability. Trying to force the debt holders hand, as they have been the most recalcitrant in the negotiations. Read more

Eerie Parallels to the Great Depression…

Things could get much worse not only for the United States but for the rest of the world:

The International Monetary Fund has warned of “worrisome parallels” between the current global crisis and the Great Depression, despite the unprecedented steps already taken by central banks and governments worldwide.

This recession is likely to be “unusually long and severe, and the recovery sluggish,” said the Fund, releasing two advance chapters from its World Economic Outlook. However, it warned there is a risk that it could spiral down into a full-blown slump unless further action is taken to stop “feedback effects” gathering force.

Dominique Strauss-Kahn, head of the IMF, said millions of people risk being pushed back into poverty as the economic storm ravages the most vulnerable countries. “The human consequences could be absolutely devastating. This is a truly global crisis, and nobody is escaping,” he said.

Synchronised world recessions striking all major regions are “historically rare” events, the Fund said. They last one and a half times as long typical downturns, and are followed by painfully slow recoveries.

William Graham Sumner, an economics professor at Yale University, wrote in 1883 about the Forgotten Man.  His synopsis is one of the best I have heard and it was played out during the Great Depression as FDR took the reigns and tried to make a Utopian, collectivist society to raise up the poor, but step all over the middle class.  Those who lived through the Great Depression and who made up the middle class, such as my grandmother, can speak passionately and clearly to this day about the policies of FDR and against those who believe in progressive, socialistic societies.  Sumner wrote:

A and B put their heads together to decide what C shall be made to do for D. The radical vice of all these schemes, from a sociological point of view, is that C is not allowed a voice in the matter, and his position, character, and interests, as well as the ultimate effects on society through C’s interests, are entirely overlooked. I call C the Forgotten Man.

For once let us look him up and consider his case, for the characteristic of all social doctors is that they fix their minds on some man or group of men whose case appeals to the sympathies and the imagination, and they plan remedies addressed to the particular trouble; they do not understand that all the parts of society hold together, and that forces which are set in action act and react throughout the whole organism, until an equilibrium is produced by a readjustment of all interests and rights.

They therefore ignore entirely the source from which they must draw all the energy which they employ in their remedies, and they ignore all the effects on other members of society than the ones they have in view. They are always under the dominion of the superstition of government, and, forgetting that a government produces nothing at all, they leave out of sight the first fact to be remembered in all social discussion — that the state cannot get a cent for any man without taking it from some other man, and this latter must be a man who has produced and saved it. This latter is the Forgotten Man.

There always are two parties. The second one is always the Forgotten Man, and any one who wants to truly understand the matter in question must go and search for the Forgotten Man. He will be found to be worthy, industrious, independent, and self-supporting. He is not, technically, “poor” or “weak”; he minds his own business, and makes no complaint. Consequently the philanthropists never think of him, and trample on him.

[...]

For our present purpose it is most important to notice that if we lift any man up we must have a fulcrum, or point of reaction. In society that means that to lift one man up we push another down. The schemes for improving the condition of the working classes interfere in the competition of workmen with each other. The beneficiaries are selected by favoritism, and are apt to be those who have recommended themselves to the friends of humanity by language or conduct which does not betoken independence and energy. Those who suffer a corresponding depression by the interference are the independent and self-reliant, who once more are forgotten or passed over; and the friends of humanity once more appear, in their zeal to help somebody, to be trampling on those who are trying to help themselves.

[...]

The question then arises, Who is C? He is the man who wants alcoholic liquors for any honest purpose whatsoever, who would use his liberty without abusing it, who would occasion no public question, and trouble nobody at all. He is the Forgotten Man again, and as soon as he is drawn from his obscurity we see that he is just what each one of us ought to be.

No truer words were ever spoken and how prophetic his analysis is today.  It amazes me how so many in the past, whether it was our founding fathers or men like William Graham Sumner, knew the very essence of the issues that continue to stifle us today.  The true condition of what it means to be American and those Forgotten Men and Women that really do make up this great nation.

Read more

Government Motors: Government Wants Equity Shares

Photobucket

The U.S. government is considering swapping some of the $13.4 billion it lent General Motors Corp for an equity stake in a stripped-down version of the carmaker, people familiar with the matter said.

A government stake would mean a smaller share of the new company for bondholders, who own $27.5 billion in GM debt. Bondholders had been offered 90 percent of the new entity’s equity by the company. The swap would be part of an effort to cut GM’s debt as the carmaker approaches a June 1 deadline to come up with a plan to become viable, the people said.

“What the government is doing is stepping them down and easing the blow,” said Albert Angrisani, a turnaround executive who was assistant secretary of labor under President Ronald Reagan. In doing that, “they lessen the rights of the creditors in bankruptcy,” he said.

A government stake, “means you essentially have a nationalized General Motors until such time as the government sells off its equity to someone else, which won’t happen for a while,” said Gerald Meyers, a professor at the University of Michigan Ross School of Business and a former chairman of American Motors Corp. “The problem is it’s political. On the other hand, it’s a cheap way for the good GM to keep going and probably solidify its strengths.”

I can’t wait to see how this plays out – keep a close eye on how the government handles this and if they pull our or not.  I have a feeling that D.C. is power hungry and this may just prove that inclination.
Photobucket

GM has been seeking to reduce its obligations to a union- run health care fund, owed $20.4 billion, and bondholders, whose debt is trading at as little as 8 cents on the dollar. Talks with those constituents are held up because of uncertainty about the value of the new company and the unprofitable assets it would leave behind for creditors to fight over, the person said.

Retirees owed health benefits would probably get more equity in the new company than bondholders, who would likely get only “a sliver,” the person said.

But it’s never the union’s fault!  I mean, we fired the CEO of GM, but not the head of the union – yet the union is one of the reasons why GM has become so unprofitable.  Is it the only reason? No, of course not, but in my opinion, it is the largest reason.

President Barack Obama believes bankruptcy is the most likely way for GM to become a competitive automaker, people familiar with the matter said.

Captain Obvious has graced us with his presence again!  How long have fiscal conservatives been arguing for free markets – which would have meant that GM file for bankruptcy months ago?  They would not have received a bailout, taxpayers would still have more money in their pockets, the government wouldn’t be as in debt, and the government would not be in control of a private, free market, company.  If they do go bankrupt does that mean we get our money back that was obviously wasted on a company that never could have dug themselves out in the first place?  Yeah… I thought so…
Photobucket

Next Page »