OTV, Pravda, GBCN… State Run News Coming to the U.S.
Posted by CrabbyCon on May 22, 2009 · Leave a Comment
Obama, yesterday, launched his own news network. Rather than allowing the White House press corps to take photos and interview the UCONN women’s team at the White House, they were denied access and told that the White House was creating their own news channel and would conduct all necessary reporting of the event themselves.
“After shaking hands with the team’s parents and members of Congress who showed up, the president walked the team over to his basketball court and shot hoops. The pool was held back from the stroll down the drive and around the corner, and couldn’t see the court. Poolers could hear periodic cheering coming from the other side of the bushes.”
Read the TV pool report: “Your Pool was not allowed to go over and shoot POTUS with the team shooting hoops. We protested loudly.”
Now we know why: Obama White House officials decided to do their own media report on the visit, complete with cuts, interviews, and chyrons identifying who’s speaking.
Also, just like a network, they have their own little logo!
So I have heard the term Pravda being paraded around again (the old Soviet run newspaper that meant ‘Truth’ in English), but that’s too boring, then there is OTV, of course for Obama TV, aptly named by Jake Tapper, GBCN which I figured could stand for Government Broadcasting Communism Network or my favorite, American Communism Obama Reinforcing Network or ACORN…
Whatever the name, it’s still pretty disturbing that an administration so hell-bent on controlling everything in the free market is also taking over the airwaves. This is the socialism/communism creep; frog in a pot analogy.
What I don’t understand is that this should scare people, no matter what side of the aisle you are on, however, the Obama appeasers are still backing his every move. If the White House or any government is putting out its own news it has to be biased. It will be politically slanted based upon whichever party they are part of. This is what Soviet Russia, Venezuela, North Korea, China, and Cuba do. They do not allow dissent and they only put out “news” they deem acceptable – most of which promotes what they are doing – there can never be an opposing opinion less you end up in some prison or killed for that matter. This is getting unbelievably ridiculous and the cult followers are getting scarier by the minute!
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” ~ Joseph Goebbels (Chief Propagandist of the National Socialist Party of Germany or Nazis)
Filed under ACORN, Media, Obama, Obama Administration, Socialism · Tagged with acorn, Communism, Media, Obama, Obama Administration, Propaganda, Socialism, White House
Blame America Tour Featuring Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers
Posted by CrabbyCon on May 20, 2009 · Leave a Comment
We have few iconic couples from the 1960s and 1970s left. Sonny and Cher divorced and went their separate ways politically. Republican Congressman Sonny Bono died tragically in a skiing accident in 1998. Cher continues to perform by herself.
But not all was Laugh-In and flower power.
Today another famous couple, comrades-in-arms and former collaborators in Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), Weatherman, and then Weather Underground — and now coauthors of the book Race Course Against White Supremacy — are bringing their show on the road.
I am talking about Bill Ayers, once-fugitive “peace activist,” whose photo of him defiling the American flag was used against his “pal” Barack Obama during the presidential campaign.
His wife, Bernardine Dohrn, praised mass murderer Charles Manson and was jailed for seven months for refusing to cooperate with a grand jury investigating the 1981 Brinks truck robbery by the Weather Underground and the Black Liberation Army that killed two policemen and a guard.
Needless to say the republicans and conservatives, from Ayers’ & Dohrn’s point of view, are the evil white supremacists in this country, however, white supremacy groups have always been socialist in nature and align more with Obama and Ayers’ type of government! These two don’t much like individual freedom or liberty – if you recall in the classroom of Ayers, he mentioned he was a communist with a small ‘c’ – hmmm… and how many people has communism hurt and/or killed?
The biggest crime is that these two teach children and indoctrinate them with their lies and false statements regarding America!
Filed under Double Standards, Socialism · Tagged with Ayers, Communism, Dohrn, Double Standards, Socialism
The Dawning of Obamunism… GM is Officially Government Motors
Posted by CrabbyCon on May 19, 2009 · Leave a Comment
Stalin would be so proud! The Donkey’s are controlling the cars:
There should be no question as to why the auto industry accepting the new CAFE standards today…
General Motors Corp’s (GM.N) plan for a bankruptcy filing involves a quick sale of the company’s healthy assets to a new company initially owned by the U.S. government, a source familiar with the situation said on Tuesday.
The source, who would not be named because he was not cleared to speak with the media, did not specify a purchase price. The new company is expected to honor the claims of secured lenders, possibly in full, according to the source.
The remaining assets of GM would stay in bankruptcy protection to satisfy other outstanding claims.
GM has about $6 billion in secured debt, including a secured revolving credit and bank debt.
The government’s plans include giving stakes in the new company to GM’s union and bondholders, although the ownership structure of the company is still being negotiated, said the source who is familiar with the company’s plans.
In addition, the government would extend a credit line to the new company and forgive the bulk of the $15.4 billion in emergency loans that the U.S. has already provided to GM, the source said.
As I have been stating… we will never see our taxpayer dollars for any of this bailout nonsense. These bankruptcies were inevitable and they just threw money down a black hole!
The government has given GM until June 1 to restructure its operations to lower its debt burden and employee costs.
Not ‘gonna happen!
If those talks failed, the company has said it would follow rival Chrysler LLC into bankruptcy.
My father mentioned yesterday, on his birthday, that he would be finding out whether or not he would have a job today… GM will follow Chrysler, the question is when and how soon this summer?
Setting up a new company to buy the healthy assets is aimed at reassuring consumers who might not be willing to make a major purchase from a bankrupt company, fearing it would not honor warranties or provide service.
The board of the new company would be established with the tacit approval of the government. Fritz Henderson, who took the helm of GM earlier this year after the government pushed out Rick Wagoner, would likely head the new company, the source said.
GM could not be immediately reached for comment.
GM shares were up about 9 percent at $1.29. (Editing by Gerald E. McCormick)
George Soros – stop buying up GM shares for yourself!
Filed under Auto Industry, Bailouts, Constitution, Economy, Obama, Obama Administration, Socialism · Tagged with Auto Industry, Bailouts, Chrysler, Communism, Constitution, Economy, GM, Government Motors, Obama, Obama Administration, Socialism
Cyber Security Act of 2009!?
Is that you Stalin? How is this not edging ever so closely to communism and totalitarian government? Power grab anyone?
The days of a large unregulated Internet may be coming to an end. The government, and especially the democrats, will use the latest crisis of the electronic grid hacking, although China and Russia say it did not occur, to implement a new Cyber Security Act that will control and regulate the Internet. To be quite frank, I have no idea who to believe. At this point China, Russia and the Democrats could all be working together for all I know!
The latest from Obama and “our” government:
A bill making its way through Congress proposes to give the U.S. government authority over all networks considered part of the nation’s critical infrastructure. Under the proposed Cyber Security Act of 2009, the president would have the authority to shut down Internet traffic to protect national security.
Does Obama have ultimate authority to police the net? What criteria is necessary to shut down a website or to remove an individual from the net? Does anybody get the feeling that the latest DHS report conveniently came out before most recent power grab act of 2009? Why couldn’t Obama use the DHS report to remove any right leaning websites, blogs, individuals etc.? I don’t care if you are a Democrat or a Republican this is just plain scary!
Again, I have an issue with the hypocrisy that is taking place. Liberals screamed and cried over the NSA wiretapping for known terrorists and those who had background information that would lead us to believe they had terrorist ties, but this is ok all of the sudden? The fact that something as large as the Internet may be policed is worse, in my opinion, than wiretapping. Even if you don’t agree with wiretapping, it’s not like Obama has banned wiretapping and is now only policing the net – he is doing both! Why are the liberal sheep so easily blinded by the blatant double standards here?
The government also would have access to digital data from a vast array of industries including banking, telecommunications and energy. A second bill, meanwhile, would create a national cyber security adviser — commonly referred to as the cyber security czar — within the White House to coordinate strategy with a wide range of federal agencies involved.
Oh, wonderful, another czar…
The need for greater cyber security is obvious:
– Canadian researchers recently discovered that computers in 103 countries, including those in facilities such as embassies and news media offices, were infected with software designed to steal network data.
– A Seattle security analyst warned last month that the advancement of digital communication within the electrical grid, as promoted under President Obama’s stimulus plan, would leave the nation’s electrical supply dangerously vulnerable to hackers.
– And on Tuesday the Wall Street Journal reported that computer spies had broken into the Pentagon’s $300 billion Joint Strike Fighter project and had breached the Air Force’s air-traffic-control system.
I have inside information that the electronic grid that was hacked into could easily be taken out with a gun shot – it’s not that big and it’s not that hidden. I also know for a fact that on black programs that are highly classified, they are not allowed on the net. You are placed in a pass-coded room that is closed off to everyone else, you are not allowed to bring blackberries, cell phones, cameras etc. into the room where you work, nor are you allowed to have internet access or email access on the computer containing the classified information. Your personal computer is placed at the front of the room away from classified material if you need to send emails. So I’m curious how much people actually know about classified information and why is this “classified” information on the Internet in the first place, when defense companies I have worked for in the past, do not allow that to happen? I’m only curious…
Nonetheless, the proposal to give the U.S. government the authority to regulate the Internet is sounding alarms among critics who say it’s another case of big government getting bigger and more intrusive.
Silicon Valley executives are calling the bill vague and overly intrusive, and they are rebelling at the thought of increased and costly government regulations amid the global economic crisis.
Others are concerned about the potential erosion of civil liberties. “I’m scared of it,” said Lee Tien, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based group.
“It’s really broad, and there are plenty of laws right now designed to prevent the government getting access to that kind of data. It’s the same stuff we’ve been fighting on the warrantless wiretapping.”
Isn’t that a shame? Most of these people in Silicone Valley, like the Googles and Yahoos of the world, voted for Obama. I think people really have a hard time understanding what big government really means.
The bill would allow the government to create a detailed set of standards for cyber security, as well as take over the process of certifying IT technicians. But many in the technology sector say the government is simply ill-equipped to get involved at the technical level, said Franck Journoud, a policy analyst with the Business Software Alliance.
“Simply put, who has the expertise?” he said. “It’s the industry, not the government. We have a responsibility to increase and improve security. That responsibility cannot be captured in a government standard.”
ROTFLMAO! Of course the government doesn’t have the expertise, I’m not sure they have the expertise to run a lemonade stand! We have seen what they have done to our economy, the banking system, the auto industry, the farming industry, and even the Mustang Ranch.
A spokeswoman from Rockefeller’s office said neither he nor the two senators who co-sponsored the bill, Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Bill Nelson, D-Fla., will answer questions on cyber security until a later date.
The fact that the Senators who came up with this idea are not answering questions should send up the red flags!
If the United States was to set its own standard for cyber security, they say, it would create a host of logistical challenges for technology companies, virtually all of which operate internationally.
“Any standards have to be set at an international level and be industry led,” said Dale Curtis, a spokesman for the Business Software Alliance. “This industry moves so fast, and government just doesn’t move that fast.”
How true! But, yet so many people put their trust and faith in government. They have treated Obama as if he were God-like and the man himself believes his own hype; Pathetic!
Many Silicon Valley executives remain hopeful that the White House’s recommendations will be more industry-friendly, following what Journoud said was a good dialogue with former Bush administration official Melissa Hathaway, who is leading the White House review and is considered a likely candidate for cyber security czar.
Good luck believing that Obama will be industry friendly, he is just as progressive, if not more so, than FDR, who hated the private sector. And just to remind everyone… Bush was a big government “conservative.” I have major qualms with him and his big government policies and spending practices, but I respected him for his efforts in the War on Terror. There are many politicians on both sides of the aisle that merely want the power and control and this latest act proves that it is only going to get worse from here.
It was nice knowing you Freedom of Speech! Maybe we’ll meet again one day.
Filed under Congress, Constitution, Double Standards, National Security, Obama, Obama Administration, Socialism · Tagged with Bush, Communism, Congress, Cyber Security Act 2009, Czar, Double Standards, Net Nuetrality, Obama, Obama Administration, Policing the Net, Power Grab, Socialism, Totalitarian, Wiretapping
Political Science Lesson for the Weekend
Posted by CrabbyCon on April 18, 2009 · Leave a Comment
The American Form of Government:
Filed under Constitution, Federalism, Socialism · Tagged with Communism, Democracy, Fascism, Government, Monarchy, Oligarchy, Republic, Socialism





