Volcker Getting Snubbed by Obama

Volcker was just another political pawn in Obama’s game to get to the highest office.  By name dropping during his debates or letting the press know some of his “advisers” he won over some of the more gullible voters that may have believed this old technique. 

No offense, but name-dropping is an extreme turn-off to me.  You most definitely should surround yourself with solid people, but the person running for office or applying for a job should be competent and experienced enough in the first place.

As an early supporter of Barack Obama, Paul Volcker gave the young presidential candidate gravitas and advice. He frequently sat by Mr. Obama’s side at key economic events, and started carrying a cellphone for the first time, just to be able to brainstorm with the candidate from the campaign trail.

In the Obama White House, the role of the 81-year-old former chairman of the Federal Reserve has been more limited.

The one-time central banker has been put in charge of a presidential advisory board that hasn’t yet had a formal meeting. It has been nearly a month since he has seen Mr. Obama. Mr. Volcker hasn’t been a main player in key decisions handling the global financial crisis.

He hasn’t even had one formal meeting!? Well, I guess his involvement in being part of an Anti-Stimulus campaign (Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget) for the betterment of the economy may have something to do with it – mind you it was February of 2009 (not that long ago) that he joined.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner unveiled the administration’s plans for handling troubled financial institutions and the housing crisis without seeking input from Mr. Volcker, associates say. “Paul was surprised” at the failure to consult him, particularly on issues of financial rescue after his dominant role in resolving financial crises in the 1980s, says one person who has spoken to Mr. Volcker recently.

On the eve of one announcement, a Wall Street executive ran into Mr. Volcker at a cocktail party and asked what he expected from the Treasury secretary’s imminent announcement. “I have no idea what Tim’s going to say,” he responded, according to somebody there.

Seems like Paul Volcker’s fiscal restraint and tighter monetary policy was not part of the Obama agenda… So, no need to consult the man.

When Mr. Obama announced the blue-ribbon advisory group on Feb. 6, he praised Mr. Volcker as “one of the world’s foremost economic policy experts.” With big names like General Electric Co. Chief Executive Jeffrey Immelt, the group, Mr. Obama said, would provide “voices to come from beyond the Washington echo chamber….” At a ceremony in the White House’s East Room, the president added that the group would “meet regularly” with him.

So far, the full group hasn’t met. “The whole organizational side of this has been a nightmare,” Mr. Volcker says. A White House spokeswoman says it will hold its first quarterly meeting in mid-May.

First of all, Immelt is an incompetent hack pretending to be a CEO.  General Electric has bombed since he took over, so to expect that he would have anything of value to add is hilarious.  The other bit of hilarity in this is that they did not plan to have a “meeting of the minds” until mid May with all of the economic turmoil currently going on?  That’s insane and should give us insight into the poor management/governing abilities and practices of this administration.

Mr. Volcker’s advice hasn’t always been heeded. The former Fed chairman urged the administration to “slow down” its push for regulatory changes. “Paul thought it was important to take enough time to fill holes in the regulatory framework and not get caught up in the current atmosphere,” says former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman William Donaldson, who’s on the Volcker panel.

When a former Fed official, attorney John Walker, recently met Mr. Volcker, Mr. Walker told him the administration “isn’t getting the best use of you.” Mr. Volcker shrugged it off, saying he’s comfortable with his role. Mr. Walker says Mr. Volcker added: “I’m 81 years old.”

Paul, you are making too much sense for these guys even at the age of 81 – please stop!… Heh

Obama Refuses TARP Payback; Geithner Wants More Control

What are we all supposed to make of this?  Why is calling something socialist such a bad thing nowadays?  It’s not like Europe isn’t “out of the closet” socialist.  Stop with the denial already and let’s call a spade a spade.  I will write more on this blatant denial this week in an op-ed piece.

As many of us, who are on top of the news cycles, are aware, TARP funds from when President Bush was in office during the first bailout of late September, have been given back to the government.  At least that’s what many are attempting to do. 

The issue at play is the media is making a huge deal about all the “big guns” in the financial industry like Bank of America, Wachovia, Citibank, AIG etc. but they do not disclose that many of the smaller banks, those that are local or regional to specific states), were safe from the economic crisis because they did not get involved with hybrid securities, mortgage-backed loans or the sub-prime market. 

These small banks don’t want the TARP money, they never did want it.  The main reason they didn’t want the hand-out was knowing there would be strings attached from the government.  We have seen what taking government/taxpayer funds has done to the likes of GM, Chrysler and AIG.  I’m sure we will see more from Citibank and Bank of America in the coming months as well.  The government can control what you do and how you do it.  No need for a board of directors – the government will pressure the CEO to leave.  No need for bankruptcy court, the government will make sure you meet its plan to restructure and then produce things that it deems acceptable – like green cars. 

Read more

Geithner Leaves Door Open to Oust More CEOs if Necessary

Above is the full Katie Couric interview with Geithner. 

Days after GM’s CEO Rick Wagoner was forced out by the Obama administration, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner left open the possibility that such moves could happen again.

This is very similiar to other countries living behind an iron curtain or our most progressive president FDR, who scared the private sector and then wondered why it took so long to come out of the depression.  What talented person wants to work their way up in a company, always mindful, looking of their shoulder for the government’s action and intervention to cap their salaries, demonize them in the public eye or just kick them out of their position?  Would you want to work in a society that allows that to occur?  Does that create incentives for those who are the most talented and have the most potential to want to move up in a company or just stay at a position that is just right, never going beyond just being mediocre?  Maybe some of the best talent will also choose to move abroad and leave the United States in a weaker position economically and in turn less powerful militarily.  This is utterly insane!

Read more

What is the Treasury Doing?

We may never know…

The massive programs designed to rescue the nation’s financial sector are operating without adequate oversight, with vague goals and limited disclosure of their details to the taxpayers who are paying for them, government watchdogs told a Senate panel Tuesday.

The Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, was launched in the midst of last fall’s collapse of the nation’s banking system and is designed to get loans flowing to businesses and individuals.

But “without a clearer explanation” about parts of the program, “it is not possible to exercise meaningful oversight over Treasury’s actions,” said Elizabeth Warren, a Harvard Law School professor who leads a special congressional oversight panel monitoring the TARP program. Her comments came in a Senate Finance Committee hearing on the bailout program.

Noting that TARP passed Congress six months ago, Warren said that her group has repeatedly called on the Treasury Department to provide a clear strategy for the program — and that “the absence of such a vision hampers effective oversight.”

Although she has asked Treasury to explain its strategy, “Congress and the American public have no clear answer to that question.”

I have been harping on this for a long time now, and even my friends and family thought I was nuts… However, as I suspected and figured would happen upon the election of Barack Obama, we are now creeping closer and closer to having a Debt to Equity Ratio of 1 meaning that our Debt is almost equal to our GDP.

Read more

Another Hero – Donald Manzullo (R-Ill) Grills Geithner and Calls his Plans Radical!

« Previous PageNext Page »