House Panel Votes Against E-Verify Amendments in Stimulus Bill

E-Verify is an employment eligibility verification system which helps companies certify that their employees are able to work in the United States legally.  There was a lot of concern that, when passed, the Stimulus Bill which should create jobs and opportunities for Americans, would do the exact opposite.  Not only will the Stimulus Bill increase our deficit but it’s focus is on paying off donors, creating jobs for specific Democrat constituents, and giving employment opportunities to illegal aliens.  The Republicans saw all of this coming and the one thing they could curtail was the illegal alien loop-hole by amending the bill so that it would contain a stipulation requiring that the jobs created by the stimulus must go through the E-Verify certification system.  Representatives Kingston and Calvert were on the forefront of this matter:

One of Rep. Kingston’s amendments would have required all federal contractors to verify all employees and new hires through the E-Verify system. The amendment would have countered a new executive order that the Administration is expected to announce today that weakens the 2008 executive order requiring all government contractors to use E-Verify. The amendment failed by a 23-to-35 vote.

Rep. Kingston’s second amendment would have required all employees, contractors, and subcontractors of the Legislative Branch to use E-Verify. That amendment failed by a voice vote.

Rep. Calvart’s amendment would have permanently reauthorized E-Verify, but it received resistance from, most notably, Rep. David Price who argued that E-Verify will be addressed during a larger immigration reform debate. The amendment failed 21-to-36.

American jobs are already being lost to illegal immigrants and health care costs are rising due to taxpaying Americans footing the bill for those who don’t contribute.  America’s unemployment rate is creeping close to 10%.  American citizens are out of work, but without E-verify some of these jobs will be given to people who aren’t even on the books in the United States.  How does that help our economy and how does that lower our unemployment rate?  I’m sure at this point many Americans would gladly take a job if they are out of work, no matter what that job is.

The jobs created by the stimulus will effectively be canceled out by the jobs given away to illegal aliens or a possible amnesty bill, if it passes this Fall.

Larry Summers, Obama’s economic advisor, exclaims that the only reason the government is taking control of private industry is due out of necessity.  This is the same crisis creating, fear-mongering that liberals railed against when Bush used it during the War on Terror -  why are they so complacent now?

Lawrence Summers defended Obama’s economic actions, saying they have been “particularly consistent and firm since the crisis began while he was campaigning for president.”

Even as Capitol Hill Republicans are railing against the administration’s interventions into the auto industry, Wall Street and healthcare, Summers said “the actions we take are those of necessity, not choice.”

Mark Sanford was right when he called out Obama, stating he was creating a “Savior-based economy.”  Anything “savior-based” will fail, especially when their messiah has never taken an economics course.

Porkulus Part Deux

02/24/09

While Obama was on TV all day spewing his rhetoric about fiscal responsibility and cutting the Federal deficit in half, House Democrats introduced a $410 billion spending bill.  Associated Press  reports:

WASHINGTON (AP) -House Democrats unveiled a $410 billion spending bill on Monday to keep the government running through the end of the fiscal year, setting up the second political struggle over federal funds in less than a month with Republicans.

The measure includes thousands of earmarks, the pet projects favored by lawmakers but often criticized by the public in opinion polls. There was no official total of the bill’s earmarks, which accounted for at least $3.8 billion.

The legislation, which includes an increase of roughly 8 percent over spending in the last fiscal year, is expected to clear the House later in the week.

Democrats defended the spending increases, saying they were needed to make up for cuts enacted in recent years or proposed a year ago by then-President George W. Bush in health, education, energy and other programs.

Republicans countered that the spending in the bill far outpaced inflation, and amounted to much higher increases when combined with spending in the stimulus legislation that President Barack Obama signed last week. In a letter to top Democratic leaders, the GOP leadership called for a spending freeze, a step they said would point toward a “new standard of fiscal discipline.”

Either way, the bill advanced less than one week after Obama signed the $787 billion economic stimulus bill that all Republicans in Congress opposed except for three moderate GOP senators.

Apart from spending, the legislation provides Democrats in Congress and Obama an opportunity to reverse Bush-era policy on selected issues.

It loosens restrictions on travel to Cuba, as well as the sale of food and medicine to the communist island-nation.

In another change, the legislation bans Mexican-licensed trucks from operating outside commercial zones along the border with the United States. The Teamsters Union, which supported Obama’s election last year, hailed the move.

The Bush administration backed a pilot program to permit up to 500 trucks from 100 Mexican motor carriers access to U.S. roads.

The legislation covers programs for numerous Cabinet-level and other agencies, and takes the place of regular annual spending bills that did not pass last year as a result of a deadlock between the Bush administration and the Democratic-controlled Congress.

Congressional expenses are included. The bill provides $500,000 for what is described as a Senate “pilot program” that will defray the cost of mass mail postcards to households notifying them of a nearby town meeting to be attended by any senator.

Obama Math or, 2+2=3

02/22/09

Where your money goes

I know I’m not the sharpest knife in the drawer and when it comes to mathematics, a butter knife is a cut above me.  However, when I hear the numbers being tossed about by Washington, even I know something isn’t adding up.

The headline reads: Obama Aims to Halve Deficit by 2013.  I had to read that twice.  Halve the deficit!?  I mean, didn’t we just spend $787 billion in pork?  If you go by what the “experts” say, one third of that is tax cuts and job creation so that creates an actual total of about $520 billion in pork spending.  Stay with me, the numbers are about to get even more confusing.

We musn’t forget the $75 billion in mortgage bailout, or is it $275 billion?  I still haven’t figured this one out.  The President said it was a $75 billion dollar plan and yet the same day the news was reporting it at $275 billion.  Get out your calculator folks.  This plan is supposed to help up to 9 million homeowners by renegotiating loans to save them $6,000 on their mortgage.  According to my trusty rusty Texas Instrument, 9 million times 6 thousand equals, 54 billion.  Is your head spinning yet?

On top of all this is Geithner’s yet to be named, planned, or rolled out blueprint to save the world from economic collapse.  We don’t know what it is and he won’t tell us, but we do know it will cost at least $2 TRILLION.  In addition are the trillions in bank, insurance, and auto bailouts.

Now then, the report I read said that the new administration was left with a $1.3 trillion deficit when it took office.  Politicians prefer to say it was left with a $9 trillion deficit.  To-may-toe, to-mah-toe?  To try and reconcile these numbers, I dug a bit deeper.  Guess what I found?  They are both right!  What I learned is that there is a difference between Federal deficit and National deficit.  Say whaaat!?  You read that right folks.  There are two sets of books.  I know some of y’all already knew this but keep in mind… I am aspiring to be a butter knife.

So, when the President says he is going to cut the Federal deficit in half, he just might be able to do it; by moving pork spending and pet projects outside the budget and into spending bills, instead of within the proper budget appropriations where they rightfully belong (remember the stimulus bill).

Now that those trillions are no longer on the Federal books how is he going to halve what is left?  Well, he is going to raise taxes.  He said he will raise them on businesses and on the wealthy.  Now, I take issue with the term “wealthy” because by his definition you are wealthy if your household earns more than $250,000.  Right now, those poor schmucks who work hard, pay their mortgages, pay their bills, and earn $250,000 are paying $87,500 of their earnings in income tax.  When Obama gets through they will be paying $99,000 in income tax.  That’s just income tax, folks!  It doesn’t take into account social security, medicare, and for some, State tax.  Now, if the median household income is $40,000 then that means for every household earning $250,000, there are two jobs that could have been created had they not been taxed.  But Obama doesn’t really want to create jobs, does he?  No, he wants to take money from the so called wealthy and give it to the “poor” so that the “poor” doesn’t actually have to work.

Finally, Obama said in his weekly radio and Internet address, “We can’t generate sustained growth without getting our deficits under control.”  He said his budget will be “sober in its assessments, honest in its accounting, and lays out in detail my strategy for investing in what we need, cutting what we don’t, and restoring fiscal discipline.”  How can this guy keep a straight face when he knows he is spewing a bold faced lie!?  To add insult to injury, he is meeting tomorrow with business and union leaders, academics and lawmakers to discuss ways of cutting the deficit.  Then on Tuesday he is addressing a joint session of congress with his budget.  If I were a business leader invited to this faux meeting, I wouldn’t go.  It’s an insult to say you want input on something when you have already made up your mind.  Kinda like when he wanted input from Republicans on the stimulus bill when he had no intention of listening.

One more thing before I go repair the hole in the wall left by my Texas Instrument.  Remember the $13 per week we are to receive?  Evidentally, Obama is using a different calculator because in his address he claims it is $65 per month.  I still haven’t figured that one out.  If anyone can enlighten me please do!

Do You Feel More Prosperous Today?

02/12/09

This week Obama and his traveling minstrels have been holding tent revivals across the eastern states.  As savior of the world, he has made women swoon and young men shout to the heavens praising his name.  In his camp meetings Obama has made clear that his plan for us will create jobs, save homes, and put money in our pockets.  He promised everything to his children like any good messiah would.  Right?

While he was bringing his message of salvation, his closest disciples were cramped together chiseling out the final details of his commandments.  As they descended from the mountain we find enscribed on the tablets: $46 billion highway, bridge and mass transit construction.  (If you are an equipment operator or a ditch digger, this is good news.  I’m college educated, I wonder if I could be a ‘digger of ditches’).  Also bestowed upon us is a 60 percent subsidy to help the unemployed pay for COBRA.  (I’m still trying to find out if that is retroactive for those thousands of people whose grace period for applying for COBRA has expired).  The provision for helping prospective home buyers is all but cut.  The $15,000 tax credit for anybody buying a home over the next year was dropped; instead, first-time homebuyers can claim an $8,000 credit; but you have to act fast!  It only lasts until the end of August.  (Since the banks aren’t loaning money, good luck with that one folks).  Out of the $790 billion dollars being spent for this stimulus and the $2 plus TRILLION dollars Geithner wants to spend and the more than $2 trillion already spent to get us out of this “crisis,” Obama’s loyal minions can expect to receive, on average, $13 per week from late spring until January.  Then it gets scaled back to $8 per week.  Last week our savior told the world that with his plan his sheep “will be able to get that car repaired, pay bills, buy groceries.”  He later told us, not to go to Las Vegas.  I don’t know about you but I am taking my $13 and investing it.  Thirteen lotto tickets.

Get a Job Schumer!

02/11/09

Yesterday, Senator Schumer (D-NY) said the American people don’t care about the pork in the stimulus bill.  I know, I know… I had to pick myself up off the floor after I heard it, too.

With the revelation that none of the hundreds of thousands of calls, emails, and faxes went to Senator Schumer (they couldn’t have, could they?  I mean, for him to make such a ludricrous statement surely he didn’t receive any of those pleas to stop the Porkulous Bill, right?) I decided it was time for me to figure out who this guy is.  Not surprisingly, I found out he is a nobody.  Oops, I mean he is a Harvard grad/career politician who never had a real day of work in his life.

This is your life Charles Schumer:

He attended Harvard College in 1968

After completing his undergraduate degree, he continued to Harvard Law School, earning his Juris Doctor in 1974.  He chose not to practice law but to enter politics.

In 1974, Schumer ran for and was elected to the New York State Assembly, at age 23.

He served three terms, from 1975-1980.

1980 elected to House of Representatives.

1998-current, Senator.

You be the judge.  Has this man ever done an honest day’s work?  Is he qualified to know what issues concern you and me?  I think not.

Next Page »